![]() ![]()
While I think 2 might be addressed by eg forcing Instagram/YouTube/etc to spin off, 1 would require the election of radicals to high office. Able to leave shareholder value somewhat intact because they were simply splitting physical assets. Seen as radical at the time, and odious to all private industry.Ģ. It seems to me that US trust busting in the past was:ġ. I don't know if you are american or not, but I'm willing to bet that most of us don't want a government login or identity for the internet. If we wanted a government login for everything, we'd already have it. When did the hacker ethos become "government is the solution for everything" so "let's trust government"? Lets solve it by having the government spy on us. Facebook is a spying and data collecting behemoth. Nevermind that the government tends to be a bureaucratic mess, it's also a major privacy and security problem. I'd rather not use a "gov" account for anything but "gov" related things. Now you want Trump to decide which companies exist? I can't believe there are people here actually advocating for government control of the private sector. My online identity is fine thank you.Īlso, why should the government help make any private company "obsolete"? Do you really want the government deciding which private company succeeds or not? So from 2008 to 2016, obama gets to decide which company gets to exist. At least not under the pretense of "fixing" social media, privacy, or fake news. But anti-trust has nothing to do with it, and I don't see how splitting any of these companies up would substantially change anything, let alone result in a net benefit. ![]() It's one thing to argue personal data aggregation, mining, and selling should be more heavily regulated (a la GDPR). None of this behavior is anti-competitive it's not destroying markets it's not transferring wealth. #FACEBOOK OVERSIGHT FACEBOOK THEVERGE PLUS#But the fact that people think of Facebook, Google, and Twitter, plus a litany of other tech companies with household recognition, should all be punished betrays their logic. It's only when a service or technology implicates social media do people really get fired up, and to a lesser degree the selling of mined personal data. Nobody is shedding a tear for Bing, Firefox, or Yahoo, and in any event nobody is arguing that Google unfairly muscled them out. #FACEBOOK OVERSIGHT FACEBOOK THEVERGE ANDROID#And most people-techies and non-techies-use and enjoy Google Search, Chrome, and Android without qualms. Few in the industry question the consequences of moving to AWS. (And neither is Microsoft any longer, for that matter.) I suppose maybe in the book publishing industry there are strong anti-trust concerns.īut I don't think this is what people have on their minds. But AFAIK AWS isn't yet acting anti-competitively. #FACEBOOK OVERSIGHT FACEBOOK THEVERGE HOW TO#With AWS, Amazon figured out how to embrace, extend, and extinguish the entire open source ecosystem. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |